Hi, On Dienstag, 17. Februar 2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > ...On the contrary there are crap packages with > maintainers, often bitroting in a team. > > As those packages don't have the chance to have a maintainer, I would > like to propose the creation of the "Packages without maintainer team" > to fix that. Obviously they should be lowNMU threshold. I don't understand. You don't propose to hijack those packages and put them on lowNMU with a virtual non-maintainer? How would that help? Or to ask differently, why do you think this will be less controversial (or better..) than, aeh, doing this with the established QA team as maintainer? ;-) (And still, how should that work (in detail)?) regards, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.