Bug#543806: marked as done (http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=sonne@debian.org lists several weird packages as wnpp)
Your message dated Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:05:45 +0100
with message-id <20091209170545.GA8406@pryan.ekaia.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#543806: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=sonne@debian.org lists several weird packages as wnpp
has caused the Debian Bug report #543806,
regarding http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=sonne@debian.org lists several weird packages as wnpp
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
543806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543806
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: important
It goes as far that I am listed to wnpp these packages:
is
a
general-purpose
python
interface
to
hdf5
Looks like my wnpp reportbug got mangled such that every word in the
description is now listed as a wnpp package. Including the hdf5 package
that I don't own (which is already packaged...)
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=sonne@debian.org
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-rc7-sonne (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:21:41AM +0100, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 06:35:55PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > retitle 543766 ITP: h5py -- general-purpose Python interface to hdf5
> > thanks
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 07:31:06AM +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > >
> > > It goes as far that I am listed to wnpp these packages:
> > >
> <...>
> > >
> > > Looks like my wnpp reportbug got mangled such that every word in the
> > > description is now listed as a wnpp package.
> >
> > This is because your ITP #543766 has a wrong subject, fixing with this mail too.
>
> Shouldn't #543806 be closed?
>
> The only other possibility I see is to modify the parser for incoming wnpp
> bugs, such that it does not create multiple reports when there is no "--"
> marker in the subject line.
> But this would break (arguably undesired) feature of being able to file
> multiple wnpp bugs in one go.
>
> Then again, the documentation on http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ does
> state that the correct subject format as being
>
> Subject: TAG: package name -- short package description
>
> so the problem in #543806 could be labeled as a case of user error.
I thought I had closed it.
Ana
--- End Message ---
Reply to: