[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#543806: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=sonne@debian.org lists several weird packages as wnpp



Hi all,

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 06:35:55PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> retitle 543766 ITP: h5py -- general-purpose Python interface to hdf5
> thanks
> 
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 07:31:06AM +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > 
> > It goes as far that I am listed to wnpp these packages:
> > 
<...>
> > 
> > Looks like my wnpp reportbug got mangled such that every word in the
> > description is now listed as a wnpp package.
> 
> This is because your ITP #543766 has a wrong subject, fixing with this mail too.

Shouldn't #543806 be closed?

The only other possibility I see is to modify the parser for incoming wnpp
bugs, such that it does not create multiple reports when there is no "--"
marker in the subject line.
But this would break (arguably undesired) feature of being able to file
multiple wnpp bugs in one go.

Then again, the documentation on http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ does
state that the correct subject format as being

	Subject: TAG: package name -- short package description

so the problem in #543806 could be labeled as a case of user error.


KR,

Filip

-- 
http://blog.sysfs.net/



Reply to: