Re: RFC: organising focused BSPs

To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org, Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: organising focused BSPs
From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 08:48:40 +0800
Message-id: <e13a36b30911301648p73416020te95c071cb6cdbabb@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <20091130161907.GA12301@usha.takhisis.invalid>
References: <20091129114348.GZ8224@patate.is-a-geek.org> <20091130161907.GA12301@usha.takhisis.invalid>

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> wrote:

> To make understand what this is about I suggest using a common name and
> I don't think it would be wise to overload "BSP". I don't mind choosing
> "Bug Day" for Debian too. If you like it, you can probably just go ahead
> and announce the "X.org Bug Day" on d-d-a.

I personally like the Party part of the BSP name, even if it is
minimised by turning the phrase into an acronym. Perhaps calling it a
Debian X Party would be good?

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply to:

Next by Date: where to leave info about "bad packages" (in the bapase sense)
Next by thread: where to leave info about "bad packages" (in the bapase sense)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread