Hi, On Samstag, 18. April 2009, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Looking at this list: Thanks for the looking and doing a summary! :-) I just looked at the two open bugs, was in a hurry and so I thought I'll just ask Ralf. Then I decided to mail the list, as the question is probably of wider interest. > - #285040 still applies, but the Policy (now 5.6.12) still says should. Ah, I missed that it's a "should" and not a "must". I would have expected a "must" :-) On Sonntag, 19. April 2009, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Yes, I haven't seen any tools break because of these bugs. Good to know. > In most cases > these are conflicts with very old versions of packages, sometimes > from the pre-policy era. Ah. regards, Holger
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.