[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bugs tagged edos-relation-warning



Hi,

On Samstag, 18. April 2009, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Looking at this list:

Thanks for the looking and doing a summary! :-) I just looked at the two open 
bugs, was in a hurry and so I thought I'll just ask Ralf. Then I decided to 
mail the list, as the question is probably of wider interest.

>  - #285040 still applies, but the Policy (now 5.6.12) still says should.

Ah, I missed that it's a "should" and not a "must". I would have expected 
a "must" :-)

On Sonntag, 19. April 2009, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Yes, I haven't seen any tools break because of these bugs. 

Good to know.

> In most cases 
> these are conflicts with very old versions of packages, sometimes
> from the pre-policy era.

Ah. 


regards,
	Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: