[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#463949: marked as done (Buildd logs (more) "can't find package rott_ in the database.")

Your message dated Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:09:13 +0100
with message-id <20080206150913.GA4282@takhisis.invalid>
and subject line Bug#463949: Buildd logs (more) "can't find package rott_ in the database."
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: qa.debian.org

Hello,

I am the maintainer for the 'rott' package.
On the PTS page for this package [1] there is a link called '(more)' to the right of 'Buildd logs'. The link points to the following site, which tells me that it "can't find package rott_ in the database.": 
http://experimental.debian.net/build.php?pkg=rott
However, on my maintainer QA page [2] there is a similar link called 'Buildd' in the Buildd part of the table for the rott package. This link points to the following site, which indeed lists all available buildd logs for the rott package: 
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=rott
Thus I suggest changing the link in the PTS page to match the one from the QA page.
Additionally, on the QA page there is another link called 'More' just beneath the 'Buildd' link. This does however not point to the same site as the 'more' link from the PTS page. Instead it points to the following site, which contains some useful information about the package status on the different architectures: 
http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=rott
This page is very interesting and I suggest adding it to the PTS page. But then, please do not call it 'more' again... ;) 

Cheers,
Fabian

[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rott.html
[2] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=fabian@debian-unofficial.org

--
Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath

Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT)
Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134
D-44780 Bochum

Telefon: +49 (0)234 / 32-26334
Fax:     +49 (0)234 / 32-14227
E-Mail:  greffrath@leat.ruhr-uni-bochum.de

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 11:36:07AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> On the PTS page for this package [1] there is a link called '(more)' to  
> the right of 'Buildd logs'. The link points to the following site, which  
> tells me that it "can't find package rott_ in the database.":
> http://experimental.debian.net/build.php?pkg=rott

Fair enough, the name "more" is not in sync with the very same name of
the DDPO pages.

> However, on my maintainer QA page [2] there is a similar link called  
> 'Buildd' in the Buildd part of the table for the rott package. This link  
> points to the following site, which indeed lists all available buildd  
> logs for the rott package:
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=rott

This link was already available in the PTS, the anchor has always been
"buildd logs".

This bug is now fixed, and now the Buildd line is like:

  Buildd: logs, more, exp, ports

with the following mappings anchor -> build log database

- logs  -> buildd.d.o
- more  -> ~igloo on people.d.o
- exp   -> experimental.d.n
- ports -> debian ports

appropriate tooltips have been added to the anchors, in the hope to ease
understanding of where the hyperlinks lead to.

Thanks for your report.
Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org}  -<%>-  http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: