(with neither PTS or DDPO hat on, just a porter passing by.) On 04/02/2008, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Hello, Hi, > On the PTS page for this package [1] there is a link called '(more)' > to the right of 'Buildd logs'. The link points to the following > site, which tells me that it "can't find package rott_ in the > database.": http://experimental.debian.net/build.php?pkg=rott because your package wasn't ever uploaded to experimental, or to backports, hence no log in the experimental.ftbfs.de database. Note that kfreebsd-* and hurd-i386 used to be referenced there as well, and armel recently, and that they moved to debian-ports some weeks (months already?) ago. I guess that tracking the “this package is in that wanna-build database would be a bit tedious”, and that it doesn't harm very much to keep all links available. Maybe a “subtitle” might be added to distinguish “unstable”, “experimental+bpo”, and “ports”, so that it gets a bit more clear? > however, on my maintainer QA page [2] there is a similar link called > 'Buildd' in the Buildd part of the table for the rott package. This > link points to the following site, which indeed lists all available > buildd logs for the rott package: > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=rott But only official ones, for unstable. > Additionally, on the QA page there is another link called 'More' > just beneath the 'Buildd' link. This does however not point to the > same site as the 'more' link from the PTS page. I guess that part can be adjusted, as said above. > Instead it points to the following site, which contains some useful > information about the package status on the different architectures: > http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=rott > This page is very interesting and I suggest adding it to the PTS > page. But then, please do not call it 'more' again... ;) Indeed, it's a quite good overview of build states. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois
Attachment:
pgpUiShVDQ3Dx.pgp
Description: PGP signature