Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 02:54:23PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=npolsr-cleanup;users=debian-qa@lists.debian.org
>
> Let me see if I got it right:
> You filed a bug against karchiver because it:
> * is not in etch (because it was not uploaded in time for etch),
> * is orphaned (...); and because
> * it has a "low" popcon (283/86 inst/vote; for a package that has never been
> in stable)
> And because of those reasons we are preventing a package from being shipped
> in lenny? Is that right?
Most of the thread following this mail was not actually about that
specific package. So coming back to that: If you still feel that karchiver
should indeed be shipped with lenny, please close the bug I filed with
an explanation why leaving it in unstable is not enough in your opinion.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Reply to: