[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#471562: marked as done (Include maintainer karma on qa pages?)

Your message dated Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:19:29 +0200
with message-id <20080613211929.GJ5121@df7cb.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#471562: Include maintainer karma on qa pages?
has caused the Debian Bug report #471562,
regarding Include maintainer karma on qa pages?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
471562: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=471562
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: n/a; 2008-03-19
Severity: wishlist

One thing I suspect would be useful to have on the qa pages (as in
<URL:http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pere@debian.org> and
<URL:http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/buoy.html>), is information on
the maintainers karma as described on
<URL:http://asdfasdf.debian.net/~tar/bugstats/>.

It would make it a bit easier to decide if an NMU should be done right
away, or if it is better to wait more a bit to give a maintainer with
high karma value time to act on a given bug.

Happy hacking,
-- 
Petter Reinholdtsen

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Re: Petter Reinholdtsen 2008-03-19 <2flfxun7i0j.fsf@klodrik.uio.no>
> One thing I suspect would be useful to have on the qa pages (as in
> <URL:http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pere@debian.org> and
> <URL:http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/buoy.html>), is information on
> the maintainers karma as described on
> <URL:http://asdfasdf.debian.net/~tar/bugstats/>.

Hi Petter,

thanks for the suggestion. However, I wouldn't trust this karma at
all. It is just a formula that stashes too many variables together in
some non-meaningful way. It has some entertainment value, but I would
strongly oppose its usage on some serious QA page. Some of the
maintainers with high karma are actually quite MIA (e.g. turbo).

I'll close the bug as I don't think we can come up with a formula that
would actually work.

Christoph
-- 
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: