Re: Bug#453487: Severity of "should this package be orphaned/removed" bugs

To: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#453487: Severity of "should this package be orphaned/removed" bugs
From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:47:19 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080327164719.GA19847@xanadu.blop.info>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] fsghmm$6tv$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20080327100913.GA6389@galadriel.inutil.org> <handler.s.C.120661256017130.transcript@bugs.debian.org> <[🔎] 20080327105811.GA14091@xanadu.blop.info> <[🔎] fsghmm$6tv$1@ger.gmane.org>

On 27/03/08 at 10:23 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Other than that, IMHO we should not be cloning the bug reports when
> orphaning before removing a package. Since yesterday I began reassign the
> reports to package,wnpp and retitling them without dropping the severity of
> the report.

Ah, that's a very good idea. I will update the doc in collab-qa/bapase
accordingly, when we reach consensus on the severity issue.

Thank you,
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |

Reply to:

References:
- Severity of "should this package be orphaned/removed" bugs
  - From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
- Re: Bug#453487: Severity of "should this package be orphaned/removed" bugs
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#453487: Severity of "should this package be orphaned/removed" bugs
Next by Date: Re: Severity of "should this package be orphaned/removed" bugs
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#453487: Severity of "should this package be orphaned/removed" bugs
Next by thread: Re: Severity of "should this package be orphaned/removed" bugs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread