Re: Bug#453487: Severity of "should this package be orphaned/removed" bugs

[Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>]

Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> 
> Luk, what are the reasons why you think that severity: important is more
> suitable than severity: serious? If it's only because it blocks testing
> transitions, we could mark the bugs as found in the testing version
> where needed, so testing transitions can still happen.

I don't think it's because of that, those packages usually have the same
version in sid, lenny and etch (or sarge, if it didn't make it for etch).


Other than that, IMHO we should not be cloning the bug reports when
orphaning before removing a package. Since yesterday I began reassign the
reports to package,wnpp and retitling them without dropping the severity of
the report.

Cheers,
-- 
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html