Re: [RFC/RFH] Post-etch archive cleanup: let's work on something organized!
On 28/02/07 at 13:21 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 12:55 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 11:24 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > 1. A list of packages matching:
> > > "was in sid on etch freeze date, is still in sid, but isn't in etch"
> > > is generated and commited to the collab-qa svn repository
> >
> > That excludes young packages (good!).
>
> Maybe the selection should use "freeze date - 10 days". For example,
> these packages entered unstable on 2006-12-10:
>
> gamazons
> gmorgan
> kcheckers
>
> I don't know how many packages are in this situation, so I'm not sure
> whether it's worth the trouble of regenerating the lists.
Right ; I re-generated the lists with 2006-12-01 as base, and modified
the lists accordingly.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Reply to: