(Please CC: me, I'm not subscribed) Re: http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php Begin forwarded message: Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:34:21 +0100 From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> To: Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org> Subject: Re: Identifying RC bugs * Neil Williams (codehelp@debian.org) [070228 12:27]: > On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:29:31 +0100 > Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> wrote: > > > Legend:[P+HMRSUD<Nb] Pending/=merged, +patch, Help, Moreinfo, > > unReproducible, Security, Upstream/Claimed, upload in Delayed, > > <testing removal hinted, New, only in unsta'b'le/'t'esting/" > > "both/-not in testing/?no version tracking. > > I'd like to see that Legend higher up the page and the mouse-hover > feature may be better being mentioned explicitly - it is a nice feature > that the 'official' page does not include, no point hiding it. > > Personally, I always find a sans-serif font easier to read for the > 'help' text at the top and the [FREEZE] / [FROZEN] push the package > name to the right which makes it a little harder to scan the page, I > think it would be better if the package name always appears above the > set of tags in the bracket. It would be best if you raise this topic on the debian-qa-list (feel free to quote me) - there are several people with write access there. > > > I did (try to) read the legend explanation but it doesn't mention T > > > - maybe it's just compressed too much, a more verbose legend would > > > be helpful. It isn't obvious that the final 'b' in the legend key > > > can also be a 't' or that the 't' in question is actually going to > > > be shown uppercase - nor is it obvious that a user should select > > > 'both' to get the list of open RC bugs that are actually holding > > > back Etch. > > > > Patches are welcome (and there are mouse hoovers as well, btw). > > I'd love to - just can't find the PHP source . . . > ;-) It is usually enough to say how the result should look like - and, btw, people have received write access if they had good enough ideas. :) (The code isn't secret, it is just "not packaged yet", that's all.) Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgpvDaFYJ5swV.pgp
Description: PGP signature