Hello, In response to On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Russ Allbery wrote: > Ugh, that's not a very good solution. That means that the next time > there's a security hole in zlib or libpng, which hasn't been uncommon, it > may also affect pngcrush and someone has to remember to update it as well. > This makes life much harder for the security team. And On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Please don't do that, it will make everyone's live (en specifically > those of the security team) much harder. I am withdrawing my request for a sponsored NMU. I have submitted a new patch report to the relevant bugs with an alternative solution. Let us see what the maintainer thinks of the new patch. Thanks and regards, Kapil. --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature