Re: Shouldn't gs-afpl be removed instead of orphaned?
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> > shoudn't gs-apfl be removed if it's superseeded by free software as per
> > your statement in the bug report?
> I agree with you, even if there are many users of gs-apfl.
> This package has many bugs and there are better alternatives in Debian.
Transition it to gs-gpl, as per the new ghostscript scenario. I.e. provide
an empty transition package.
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot