[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#380848: Renaming jaxml to python-jaxml

Jerome Alet <alet@librelogiciel.com> writes:

> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:45:49PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
>> Well, my gut feeling is that jaxml is dead upstream and not likely to
>> be adopted (I've never had much luck contacting Victor, cf. #305460,
>> #312834, #317408).  I'll be glad to be proven wrong of course.
> Your feeling was incorrect.
> The fact that there's no new upstream release doesn't mean that the 
> project is dead. Being the original author, I can confirm it is not.

I'm glad to hear that.  However, we do need a Debian maintainer for jaxml
-- it hasn't had one for a year and a half -- so I'd still like to hear
from Victor.

> I'm just back from holidays and seeing a lot of debian messages
> about this software. I'm currently trying to read the 1500 messages 
> which waited for me to be back, when this is done, if something has
> to be changed to jaxml I'll do it.

The necessary changes were Debian-specific, and have been taken care of by
Pierre [1] and me [2].

[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jaxml/news/20060802T115443Z.html
[2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jaxml/news/20060806T213217Z.html



Reply to: