On 2006-07-13T12:20+0200 Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Kai Hendry 2006-07-08 <[🔎] 20060708024906.GD5397@iki.fi> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=374242 > > My hope is that Java electric does get eventually get packaged though > > its current buggy C version in Debian should be removed. > Popcon reports >100 users, and the package has 0 RC/important bugs. > Imho it should only be removed once the Java-Version is in the > archive. I've already opened a bug for its removal. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=377942 Currently it does block to closure of the RC bug #300421. From the sounds of Michael Koch efforts (see #374242), GNU Electric requires the Sun JVM. A classic "Java trap". I'm inexperienced when it comes to these matters. If you think it is a good idea to give this upstream unmaintained code in, then fine. I've quickly prepared an NMU: http://hendry.iki.fi/debian/unstable/electric_6.05-2.2_i386.changes I've tested it too. It seems fine under lesstif2. Could someone please sponsor it? Best wishes,
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature