Should we remove printbill?

To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org, 282561@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Should we remove printbill?
From: Thomas Huriaux <thomas.huriaux@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:45:59 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060114164559.GB1470@random.kti.ae.poznan.pl>
Mail-followup-to: debian-qa@lists.debian.org, 282561@bugs.debian.org

Hi,

printbill seems to be dead upstream, RFA-bug (#282561) open more than
one year ago, last maintainer upload 3 years ago (1 NMU to fix 1 RC-bug
since this upload), only 1 popcon vote.

Any objections for its removal from unstable?

-- 
Thomas Huriaux

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should we remove printbill?
  - From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#347921: qa.debian.org still showing uninstallable after bin NMU
Next by Date: Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload
Previous by thread: Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload
Next by thread: Re: Should we remove printbill?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread