Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 03:32:42PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 08:47:44AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > Since bzr (and other arch derivates) have the benefit of NEVER forgeting
> > > which changesets are in a tree, I prefer them over any other distributed
> > > system. If anyone knows of other distributed system that saw the light and
> > > implemented this, please let me know.
> >
> > What's an example of a VCS that does forget changesets? I'm not sure I
> > understand the requirement.
>
> I never said it was a requirement.
>
> Examples are: all VCSes that do not track every changeset by an unique
> identifier which is not changed even when the changeset is migrated across
> repositories, and all VCSes that lose track of component changesets across
> merges.
Have you looked at mercurial or git? I think they both do that.
Monotone too, I assume.
--b.
Reply to: