Adeodato Simó wrote: > There was a little discussion about distributed-net-pproxy last month: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/07/msg00040.html > > To make it easier to sbd. reading the removal bug (CCed), e.g. a > ftpmaster, this is the link for this second thread: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/08/msg00068.html Since this, I've adopted distributed-net and (apropos ftp-master removing the outdated architectures - see #258401 and #177134) it is fit for release now. There are still a few things I want to do (like a major overhaul and I have some notions for a mechanism for checking for upstream updates which need further thought) but a couple of weeks from release is not the time :) Loic Le Guyader expressed interest in adopting both distributed-net and distributed-net-pproxy. I pinged him about a week before I formally adopted distributed-net with an offer to sponsor, I'm pinging again now. If Loic wants to take both packages, I'm happy to give him distributed-net and sponsor them both for him. If not then I think we should remove -pproxy from the archive. I have neither the time nor the interest to maintain it. Cheers, Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature