Re: Possibly remove libdbmusic and kmusicdb (or give them some love)

To: Andrew Pollock <apollock@debian.org>
Cc: debian-qa@lists.debian.org, 229918@bugs.debian.org, 229920@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Possibly remove libdbmusic and kmusicdb (or give them some love)
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 21:26:40 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040314212640.GE18730@deprecation.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040312112306.GA21496@daedalus.andrew.net.au>
References: <[🔎] 20040312112306.GA21496@daedalus.andrew.net.au>

reassign 229918 ftp.debian.org
retitle 229918 Please remove libdbmusic

reassign 229920 ftp.debian.org
retitle 229920 Please remove kmusicdb
thanks

* Andrew Pollock <apollock@debian.org> [2004-03-12 21:23]:
> It might be worthwhile to remove libdbmusic and kmusicdb, unless
> someone can give them a bit of love to get them into reasonable
> shape...

I agree.  They are also both out of date with regards to upstream.
While libdbmusic is in woody, kmusicdb never was.

RoQA; orphaned, buils failures, out of date compared to upstream
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com

Reply to:

References:
- Possibly remove libdbmusic and kmusicdb (or give them some love)
  - From: Andrew Pollock <apollock@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Orp in bad shape -- worth keeping or not?
Next by Date: Re: David Martinez Moreno MIA or busy?
Previous by thread: Possibly remove libdbmusic and kmusicdb (or give them some love)
Next by thread: how to resolve a bug?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread