On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:46:09PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: > For the record, this was NOT an approved NMU. I was happy for you to do it > previously, presuming you would show the changes to me BEFORE you > submitted, as you did the first time. But this one missed two critical > proceedural things Ok. Ok. Since the NMU did not get through, and the diff did. Could you please take a look at it? > > 1. You did NOT get this specific one approved by me before putting > it up > > 2. I had already started to fix all that stuff myself. As you were well > aware. Ummm.. you said you could not fix this yourself, and I indeed thought you would not be able to make the upload. > I asked for suggestions on my proposed version, not an upload of your > own version. > > >From the diffs I have looked at so far, it seems okay, so I'll probably > leave it. But I want to make it clear that you did not have my approval to > do so when you posted it. Ok. The NMU got rejected (forgot the proper -sa). Do you want to apply the changes yourself? Do you want me to 0-day NMU? 7-day NMU? 11-day NMU? Quite sincerely, I really don't care too much, I'm working on fixing your bugs at 2 am (here) when I should be sound asleep. So shoot. Javi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature