Re: A 'fixed upstream' BTS tag
- To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: A 'fixed upstream' BTS tag
- From: Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de>
- Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 18:39:20 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] pan.2003.09.09.16.39.19.596825@smurf.noris.de>
- References: <1061754396.3f49161c2d8b8@impt2-2.free.fr> <20030824235811.GH14504@riva.ucam.org> <877k52a8bn.fsf@seb128.wanadoo.fr> <20030825034938.GC16073@riva.ucam.org> <20030825075153.GB3293@mails.so.argh.org> <20030825111720.GD20299@riva.ucam.org> <20030825124906.GC8271@blabluga.hell.pl> <20030825125858.GA22042@riva.ucam.org>
Hi, Colin Watson wrote:
> Bugs should never be closed automagically. Feel free to investigate such
> bugs and make sure they only apply to potato, though.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/tag:potato
Does anybody see any problems with (manually ;-) closing these bugs if
that is confirmed?
I assume that doing the same thing to "woody"-tagged bugs would be OK
after sarge is released. Correct?
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | smurf@smurf.noris.de
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
- -
Never argue with a man who buys ink by the barrel.
Reply to: