On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:26:39PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:17:13AM +0100, Igor Genibel wrote: > > I think we must fetch information from primary ftp server not a mirror > > IMHO. > > No. ftp.uk is as primary as any other. Yes, that includes ftp.debian.org. Yes, Peter (weasel) explained me. > (If there's a problem with an official mirror, report it to > mirrors@debian.org.) I'll sent a mail to report the problem. > > [1] http://mirror.debian.org/ftp.uk.debian.org.html#sect_main > > That's generated by a script, which can be broken. If you click through the > links, you'll see that ftp.uk.d.o is as up to date as any other mirror. > I'll investigate why the script didn't see the new time stamps yet. > > In other words, the problem with your script is elsewhere. No. This is not a problem with my scripts. I sent this mail after, of course, investagations: lftp ftp.uk.debian.org:/debian/dists/unstable/main/source> ls -rw-r--r-- 1 108 101 84 Feb 16 20:42 Release -rw-r--r-- 1 108 101 726488 Feb 16 20:33 Sources.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 108 101 960511 Feb 16 20:33 Sources.gz lftp ftp.uk.debian.org:/debian/dists/unstable/main/source> and Peter's script (ftp-update) gathered information from ftp.uk.debian.org in order to be extracted to klecker:/org/qa.debian.org/data/ftp I explained this problem correctly the only thing where I was wrong is about the primary mirror. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ igor.genibel@eds.com http://www.tuxfamily.org/ igor@tuxfamily.net http://people.debian.org/~igenibel igenibel@debian.org GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Attachment:
pgpirXwp35bLE.pgp
Description: PGP signature