woody
It's great that Debian releases can build on several
architectures. That's a policy worth keeping, even
though it has delayed the release of Woody.
But trying to support as many as 11 architectures
doesn't seem sensible either. Why not drop the
3 or 4 architectures that have the most
release-critical bugs outstanding? They're just
a distraction. How many people are using Debian
GNU/Linux on hppa, anyway?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover
http://greetings.yahoo.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: