Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
including or excluding SPAM? :)
> The bugs that will be renamed are approximately (my local bts mirror is
> a few days out of date) the following: (the filed and changed numbers
> are the dates of opening and last change of the bug, in days before today)
You know what? The list is sick, purely sick.
You should probably inform each submitter as well. This could be
considered as reminder for him as well as a way to intervene if he's
still working on it/gave up or whatever, so he could retitle or
reopen the bug report.
You may also take these comments into account. I haven't checked
if the person who sent an ITP is also working on them. That's left
to you for practice. :)) If they're not equal the bug should probably
be retitled, if not then not but the submitter probably should receive
(sidenote: mail sent to nnn-submitter@bts is also publically logged
in the bts, so no need to send a mail to nnnn-submitter@bts and
> The following ITP's will be renamed to RFP's
> squeak #68122, filed: 1168, changed 1168
You can get the newest Debian packages from
> openoffice #74715, filed: 457, changed 109
Being worked on.
> gnu-pop3d #75696, filed: 444, changed 444
Contact Shaleh, I seem to recall he waited for an upstream release or
something. We already had that package but it was abandoned later.
> sapdb #88988, filed: 311, changed 305
Eckes is/was working on it.
> subversion #97234, filed: 247, changed 247
ITP'er about to retract the ITP, so go.
> openoffice #101762, filed: 207, changed 109
Ehm, didn't we have that already?
> apache2 #103471, filed: 194, changed 194
DanielS and thom are/were working on it.
The MS-DOS filesystem is nice for removable media. -- H. Peter Anvin
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
- Re: ITP->RFP
- From: Stephen Stafford <email@example.com>
- From: Bas Zoetekouw <firstname.lastname@example.org>