Re: ITP->RFP

To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ITP->RFP
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 23:16:35 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020115041635.GZ827@alcor.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020115035531.GA698@azure.humbug.org.au>
References: <[🔎] 20020114213511.GC30523@richard.a-es2.oi> <[🔎] 20020115035531.GA698@azure.humbug.org.au>

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 01:55:32PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:35:11PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> > 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
> 
> No objections, a couple of suggestions that you're welcome to ignore:
> 
> 	* consider tagging packages with legal issues as "wontfix" and making
> 	  them RFP's

Good idea.  And automatically generate the "software that can't be packaged"
page from these bugs.  That seems like a reasonable way to keep that page
up-to-date.

-- 
 - mdz

Reply to:

References:
- ITP->RFP
  - From: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>
- Re: ITP->RFP
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

Prev by Date: Re: ITP->RFP
Next by Date: Re: ITP->RFP
Previous by thread: Re: ITP->RFP
Next by thread: Re: ITP->RFP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread