Re: QA logbook
Torsten Landschoff <email@example.com> writes:
> Indeed. But OTOH this looks like a major time hog for me. Even discussing
> how to implement this can take a lot of time from our fellow developers.
> Not that I am against it, but I think we would need something to report
> on first.
Well, if we take my suggestion of "funnel everything through a QA todo
list", then we just count the completed options.
Indeed, it now seems to me that we don't need a QA todo list as it is
presently constituted. What we should do is use the existing
qa.debian.org bug list.
I'll think up a more complete scheme and post suggestions in a few
days or so.