Re: Bug #74239 - Will it ever be fixed?!
- To: packages@qa.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug #74239 - Will it ever be fixed?!
- From: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 20:51:32 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20011209205132.A12068@chrystal.opal.dhs.org>
- Reply-to: opal@debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20011128181318.A27982@debian.org>; from cjwatson@debian.org on Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 06:13:18PM -0600
- References: <000701c17855$3832ef60$0201a8c0@krutpaketet> <15365.28244.683876.734981@rapun.sel.cam.ac.uk> <20011128181318.A27982@debian.org>
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 06:13:18PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:08:04PM +0000, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > Åke Wallebom writes:
> > > #74239: ssh: X11 forwarding hangs connection attempt
> > > Package: ssh2; Severity: important; Reported by: Brian White <bcwhite@pobox.com>; 1 year and 53 days old.
> > >
> > > Will it ever be fixed?! I really want to use X11 Tunnels!
> > >
> > > Is there another package for debian which provides a ssh2
> > > compatible server?
> >
> > the openssh packages are probably what you want.
>
> Indeed (the binary package is just called 'ssh').
>
> If you need the non-free ssh in particular to be fixed for some reason
> you'll probably have to track it down yourself, as there isn't much in
> the way of maintenance happening on ssh2 (being orphaned and all). On
> the other hand if you *do* find a fix somebody will certainly be able to
> apply it.
Shouldn't the ssh2 package be removed? Just my thought.
Regards,
// Ola
> --
> Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: