Bug#91729: marked as done (Package xringd still has at least one file in /usr/doc)
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2001 22:53:11 +0200
with message-id <20010414225311.A383@om>
and subject line Closed in xringd 1.20-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2001 08:14:40 +0000
>From adam@lapdoog.doogie.org Mon Mar 26 02:14:40 2001
Return-path: <adam@lapdoog.doogie.org>
Received: from c1494421-a.alntn1.tx.home.com (localhost) [24.4.56.213]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14hS99-0001SX-00; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 02:14:39 -0600
Received: from adam by localhost with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14hS77-0004wy-00
for <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 02:12:33 -0600
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Package xringd still has at least one file in /usr/doc
Message-Id: <E14hS77-0004wy-00@localhost>
From: Adam Heath <adam@lapdoog.doogie.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 02:12:33 -0600
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Package: xringd
Version: 1.20-2, as in unstable on March 24
According to the Contents file for unstable, xringd contains at least one
file in /usr/doc/. That directory is deprecated, and policy section 13.3
says that packages should place documentation in /usr/share/doc/ instead.
Please update your package soon to use the FHS compliant documentation
location so woody can ship with its documentation in a consistent,
FHS compliant state. Thank you.
[ This bug report was automatically generated. ]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 91729-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Apr 2001 20:38:01 +0000
>From mvela@public.srce.hr Sat Apr 14 15:38:01 2001
Return-path: <mvela@public.srce.hr>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14oWnw-0004gc-00; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 15:38:00 -0500
Received: from om (asy48.jmu.carnet.hr [193.198.128.48])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id WAA28037;
Sat, 14 Apr 2001 22:37:55 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from mvela by om with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14oX2f-00006S-00; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 22:53:13 +0200
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 22:53:11 +0200
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 91086-done@bugs.debian.org, 91729-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Closed in xringd 1.20-3
Message-ID: <20010414225311.A383@om>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
X-Accept-Language: en, hr
Sender: Matej Vela <mvela@om>
Delivered-To: 91729-done@bugs.debian.org
(This report is being closed manually due to Bug#71600.)
The .changes file follows.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 19:37:31 +0200
Source: xringd
Binary: xringd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.20-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
Description:
xringd - Extended Ring Daemon - Monitor phone rings and take action.
Closes: 91086 91729
Changes:
xringd (1.20-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Package is orphaned (see #93318); maintainer set to Debian QA Group.
* Moved to debhelper 3. Closes: #91086, #91729.
* Conforms to Standards version 3.5.2:
* Added build dependencies.
* debian/rules: Support the `debug' build option.
* debian/copyright: Updated.
Files:
5e469b67969f2ea6aa89352e5e966f2e 711 comm extra xringd_1.20-3.dsc
588f7abdd420f9122f70253536644778 3012 comm extra xringd_1.20-3.diff.gz
24a93040035c77a04e3e2a2b599b910f 19232 comm extra xringd_1.20-3_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iQCVAwUBOtc/Fez+R+WhGHJJAQFCtQQAkk0P9D10RWEO8UGv/01Ec8TDj5mYs8GX
w3DOvxzXON2OmN1inUI16AtyDsdlYJ+QYfsh+t7yqMvd9DPSIzEsgO0tX994VFGp
v7mwa43A61CncqNh2B1JoYuO6HC1vEM8PZDRogoZIWtGcpx66CqiGvogDwm4VvE8
zUAg6uBCqzo=
=brkv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: