On Tue, 03 Apr 2001, Joey Hess wrote: > Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > weasel has added a page about "Stats on broken Depends, Oldlibs, > > Priorities etc." at http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php [ btw, the > > link to 'heavy' _is_ heavy. Give your browser a couple of minutes > > to render the page ] > > Interesting, but not perfect yet. :-) It seems to be missing non-free > from its db of packages or something; witness > http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?package=abuse -- says abuse-sfx is not > available on any arches, when in fact it is an arch all package that > madison shows in is every version of debian. I've now added support for all three sections (main, contrib, non-free) to debcheck. This brought up more problems which where until now filed as unsatisfied dependencies: Packages in main may not depend or recommend stuff outside of main. See http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?list=withinmain&arch=ANY for the list of packages that violate this. yours, peter -- PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** messages preferred. | : :' : By professionals, | `. `' for professionals http://www.palfrader.org/ | `- http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
pgp9bj5ygMskc.pgp
Description: PGP signature