Bug#113850: marked as done (mhonarc: New upstream available)
Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2001 00:05:57 -0700
with message-id <E15nx9J-0004iO-00@zamboni.jab.org>
and subject line 2.5.0 ETA?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2001 05:11:23 +0000
>From jeff@jab.org Sat Sep 29 00:11:23 2001
Return-path: <jeff@jab.org>
Received: from adsl-209-233-24-252.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (krueger.jab.org) [209.233.24.252]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15nCPL-0007u3-00; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 00:11:23 -0500
Received: from jeff by krueger.jab.org with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
id 15nCHp-0004E5-00; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 22:03:37 -0700
From: Jeff Breidenbach <jeff@jab.org>
Subject: mhonarc: New upstream available
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Message-Id: <E15nCHp-0004E5-00@krueger.jab.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 22:03:37 -0700
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: mhonarc
Version: 2.4.9-1
Severity: wishlist
Despite the beta labelling, MHonArc 2.5.0b2 is the primary download
offered at www.mhonarc.org. Additionally, it has been out for several
weeks with no complaints from the MHonArc mailing list.
Suggest packaging this new upstream version of MHonArc.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux krueger 2.4.9-686-smp #1 SMP Sun Aug 19 11:17:05 EST 2001 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages mhonarc depends on:
ii libdigest-md5- 2.13-2 MD5 Message Digest for Perl
ii perl 5.6.1-5 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction and Report
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 113850-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2001 07:35:45 +0000
>From jeff@jab.org Mon Oct 01 02:35:45 2001
Return-path: <jeff@jab.org>
Received: from mail-archive.com (zamboni.jab.org) [198.186.203.28]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15nxc9-0004Yq-00; Mon, 01 Oct 2001 02:35:45 -0500
Received: from jeff by zamboni.jab.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 15nx9J-0004iO-00; Mon, 01 Oct 2001 00:05:57 -0700
From: Jeff Breidenbach <jeff@jab.org>
To: jerome.marant@free.fr, 113850-done@bugs.debian.org, cjwatson@debian.org
In-reply-to: <20010930220312.2046.qmail@web11607.mail.yahoo.com> (message from
Earl Hood on Sun, 30 Sep 2001 15:03:12 -0700 (PDT))
Subject: Re: 2.5.0 ETA?
References: <20010930220312.2046.qmail@web11607.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-Id: <E15nx9J-0004iO-00@zamboni.jab.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 00:05:57 -0700
Delivered-To: 113850-done@bugs.debian.org
> ... [Jerome] might adopt [mhonarc].
Great!
Jerome/Colin: If for any reason the mhonarc package does not get
adopted, please notify me and I will pick it up immediately.
>2.5.0 should be released sometime soon.
Due to expected near-term release of 2.5.0, I withdraw my request to
package 2.5.0b2, and am closing wishlist #113850.
Cheers,
Jeff
PS. Upstream's mention of TSLICE and "patched resource" files has
nothing to do with 2.5.0 vs. 2.5.0b2 stability. Earl happened to
be commenting on the particular configuration of mail-archive.com,
a project I work on.
Reply to: