[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Sudhakar Chandrasekharan is MIA [MAILER-DAEMON@ywing.netscape.com: Returned mail: see transcript for details]



Hi,

This has been going on for quite a while. Unless someone can reach thaths,
he should be considered MIA and his packages should be orphaned. :/

----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@ywing.netscape.com> -----

Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:50:40 +0200
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 07:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@ywing.netscape.com>
To: <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)

The original message was received at Tue, 24 Jul 2001 07:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
from master.debian.org [216.234.231.130]

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<thaths@netscape.com>
    (reason: 550 5.1.1 <thaths@netscape.com>... User unknown)

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to hemail.netscape.com.:
>>> RCPT To:<thaths@netscape.com>
<<< 550 5.1.1 <thaths@netscape.com>... User unknown
550 5.1.1 <thaths@netscape.com>... User unknown

Reporting-MTA: dns; ywing.netscape.com
Received-From-MTA: DNS; master.debian.org
Arrival-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 07:48:04 -0700 (PDT)

Final-Recipient: RFC822; thaths@netscape.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; hemail.netscape.com
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.1.1 <thaths@netscape.com>... User unknown
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 07:48:04 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Bug#106443: won't build with gcc 3.0
Reply-To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>, 106443@bugs.debian.org
Orignal-Sender: <willy@www.linux.org.uk>
X-Debian-PR-Package: aspell
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:39:56 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i


Package: aspell
Version: 0.32.6-3.4
Severity: serious

due to changes in gcc 3.0 to be more strictly standards-conforming,
aspell will no longer compile.  i've started on fixing the problems,
but i'm really not a c++ expert.  here's a partial patch which improves
things, but does not yet allow it to compile.  You can try compiling
on paer.debian.org.

diff -ur aspell-0.32.6/util/exception.hh aspell-mine/util/exception.hh
--- aspell-0.32.6/util/exception.hh     Sat Apr  1 01:43:01 2000
+++ aspell-mine/util/exception.hh       Tue Jul 24 08:00:59 2001
@@ -13,9 +13,9 @@
   struct Exception : public exception {
     string message;
     int    number;
-    Exception(const string & w, int n = PERROR_OTHER)
+    Exception(const string & w, int n = PERROR_OTHER) throw()
       : message(w), number(n) {}
-    const char * what() const {return message.c_str();}
+    const char * what() const throw() {return message.c_str();}
   protected:
     Exception() : number(PERROR_OTHER) {}
   };
diff -ur aspell-0.32.6/util/phonet.cc aspell-mine/util/phonet.cc
--- aspell-0.32.6/util/phonet.cc        Sat Sep 30 17:11:32 2000
+++ aspell-mine/util/phonet.cc  Tue Jul 24 07:42:52 2001
@@ -36,6 +36,8 @@
 #include <iostream>
 #include <iomanip>
 
+using namespace std;
+
 #include "trim_space.hh"
 #include "phonet.hh"
 #include "file_exceps.hh"
diff -ur aspell-0.32.6/util/split.hh aspell-mine/util/split.hh
--- aspell-0.32.6/util/split.hh Wed Jan 19 14:53:00 2000
+++ aspell-mine/util/split.hh   Tue Jul 24 07:35:47 2001
@@ -2,5 +2,7 @@
 #include <vector>
 #include <string>
 
+using namespace std;
+
 vector<string> split(const string &);
 
diff -ur aspell-0.32.6/util/trim_space.cc aspell-mine/util/trim_space.cc
--- aspell-0.32.6/util/trim_space.cc    Wed Jan 19 14:52:55 2000
+++ aspell-mine/util/trim_space.cc      Tue Jul 24 07:40:34 2001
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 
 #include <string>
 
+using std::string;
+
 namespace autil {
 
   string trim_space(const string & s) {


Also, util/Makefile contains

INCLUDES = -I$(includedir)

which passes -I/usr/include to gcc which breaks libstdc++.  I just commented
this out.

-- 
Revolutions do not require corporate support.



----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification



Reply to: