Re: Uploads for asmodem and knews
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 03:33:13PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:28:19PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've uploaded new packages for asmodem and knews to fix some bugs in these
> > > packages.
> > As I said several hours ago,
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa-0102/msg00163.html
> I'm wondering why you didn't retitle #70864? When you intend to adopt it
> you should retitle the according WNPP bug.
I wasn't intending on adopting, just doing a -qa upload.
>
> > so..
> > I've moved the asmodem packages from /incoming to my ~ on auric, I'm
> > sure your package is fine, but I'd like to make this package
> > DFSG-free before uploading a fixed one into main, if the situation
> > can't be resolved (I doubt it), it should go into non-free.
> >...
> > This license does not meet criteria 3 of the DFSG "Derived Works"
> > i.e. it does not expressly permit modifications and redistributing
> > modified stuff.
> >...
>
> That sounds logical. Could you perhaps file a RC bug on the license issue?
I didn't see the point in filing a bug, as I expected to have the
situation resolved within 24 hours or so, feel free to file if you
think there is a need.
--
Brian Russo <brusso@phys.hawaii.edu>
Debian/GNU Linux <wolfie@debian.org> http://www.debian.org
LPSG "member" <wolfie@lpsg.org> http://www.lpsg.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Reply to: