On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 10:13:53AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote: > On 00-12-09 Gordon Sadler wrote: > > Pardon my ignorance, but the libpam-pwdb that this bug refers to not > > being available seems to be in an odd position. It IS available, > > however only on auric, testing. I track quite a few mirrors, to > > Well, maybe the maintainer of libpam-pwdb can comment on this and tell > us, what the future of this package will be. BenC wants it dead. -- Mike Stone
Attachment:
pgpyLifUiXzEH.pgp
Description: PGP signature