Re: Quality Assurance for Potato needed
- To: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>, Debian QA <debian-QA@lists.debian.org>
- Cc: Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl>, debconf@packages.debian.org, console-data@packages.debian.org, perl@packages.debian.org, emacs20@packages.debian.org, telnet@packages.debian.org, sysutils@packages.debian.org, libstdc++2.10-dev@packages.debian.org, lockfile-progs@packages.debian.org, nfs-server@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Quality Assurance for Potato needed
- From: Raphael Hertzog <rhertzog@hrnet.fr>
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 13:21:04 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20000307132104.A2445@k6.resI.insa-lyon.fr>
- Reply-to: debian-qa@lists.debian.org, rhertzog@hrnet.fr
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000306010100.B8161@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>; from Martin Schulze on Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 01:01:01AM +0100
- References: <[🔎] 20000306010100.B8161@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>
Le Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 01:01:01AM +0100, Martin Schulze écrivait:
> . Are all dependencies and recommends fulfilled within every
> respective priority fulfilled?
There are many & many problems for packages within optional & extra
priorities but for standard & higher, there isn't as much.
Some things that should be corrected (some by the ftpmaster who manages
overrides) :
- debconf should really be standard (many standard packages suggest it
already)
- perl-5.004-* shouldn't be in "base" (oldlibs would be better), but this
isn't really important.
- console-data should be required since console-tools depends on it
- some packages in standard still depends on libncurses4 instead of
libncurses5 (emacs20 for example & all xemacs*, telnet, talk,
sysutils)
- perl-5.005-base depends on libdb2 and I don't know why. But this means
that libdb2 should be required (I guess the correct solution is to
correct perl-5.005-base not to depend on libdb2, on my system it seems
to need only /lib/libdb.so.3 from libc6)
- libstdc++2.10-dev should be standard since g++ (standard depends on it)
- lockfile-progs should be important since cron depends on it
- nfs-server should be lowered to optionnal since nfs-kernel-server
(standard) conflict, replaces & provides nfs-server.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog >> 0C4CABF1 >> http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/
<pub> CD Debian : http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/debian/#cd
Formations Linux et logiciels libres : http://www.logidee.com </pub>
Reply to: