Bug#41386: marked as done (Request for updated xinetd)
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
with message-id <19991226204622.A1535@jagor.srce.hr>
and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 1999 19:48:40 +0000
Received: (qmail 821 invoked from network); 15 Jul 1999 19:48:40 -0000
Received: from s8n223.hfx.andara.com (HELO ghost) (mail@24.222.8.223)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 1999 19:48:40 -0000
Received: from fifield by ghost with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 114rUe-0002dk-00; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 16:48:32 -0300
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 16:48:32 -0300
From: Jamie Fifield <fifield@ghost.nslug.ns.ca>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Request for updated xinetd
Message-ID: <19990715164832.A7764@ghost.nslug.ns.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i
Package: xinetd
Version: 2.2.1-8
Severity: wishlist
If I am correct in thinking that version 2.2.1 of xinetd has been packaged,
I'd love to see Debian switch to the actively developed fork of xinetd. The
currect version (2.1.8.6b5 or see
http://freshmeat.net/appindex/1998/10/30/909732313.html) has many more
useful features than the dead 2.2.1 tree.
Anyway, I've alien'ed a RPM of the package, so that's holding me over for
now, but I'd love to see a native Debian version of this tree of xinetd.
Thanks for your time!
--
Jamie Fifield
<fifield@cs.dal.ca>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 41386-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:28 +0000
Received: (qmail 30109 invoked from network); 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (jrodin@161.53.2.130)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: (from jrodin@localhost)
by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id UAA01751;
Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
From: Josip Rodin <jrodin@public.srce.hr>
To: 31500-done@bugs.debian.org, 35166-done@bugs.debian.org,
36809-done@bugs.debian.org, 37134-done@bugs.debian.org,
38361-done@bugs.debian.org, 41386-done@bugs.debian.org,
41568-done@bugs.debian.org, 43161-done@bugs.debian.org,
44099-done@bugs.debian.org, 44529-done@bugs.debian.org,
44537-done@bugs.debian.org, 45602-done@bugs.debian.org,
46572-done@bugs.debian.org, 46603-done@bugs.debian.org,
49398-done@bugs.debian.org, 49438-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
Message-ID: <19991226204622.A1535@jagor.srce.hr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i
Hi people,
All these problems you reported against Debian xinetd package
are fixed now. Please upgrade, if you can.
In case you wondered, the bugs haven't been closed until now because the
package maintainer wasn't around, and the package is in fact orphaned. I am
doing this as a member of the quality assurance group.
Thanks for reporting...
--
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
Reply to: