Re: brief thoughts on org/qa.debian.org
"Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> * For wnpp: how about "offer <>" and "unoffer <>" directives, that
>> solves another section of the wnpp.
Raphael> Is a package name enough for the Prospectives Packages ?
Yes, the rest can be determined with scripts.
>> * Is it required that packages actually have their Maintainer reset
>> to QA, or can i just generate a control mail from existing "O"
Raphael> What do you mean by « existing "O" fields » ? And what do
Raphael> you want to know ?
Sorry, that was directed at those working closely with WNPP. (Hi Joy).
I wanted to know if I can port the existing "orphaned packages" list
into the QA database without reuploads.
Raphael> There is no such thing. What should be sent there ? The new
Raphael> tasks ?
Raw traffic to the @control bot, for learning in realtime instead of
polling a web site.
<sbaker> emacs gives me a woody