Re: Signature for QA?
On Thu, Apr 01, 1999 at 11:05:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > [0] 5800 and *still* skyrocketting. wtf? Where are all these bugs
> > > *going*??
> > ITYM 35800. But it is not that bad, huge number of those are closed,
> > fixed, forwarded, merged, not really reproducible...
>
> Nope, 5800. 5812 to be exact. Check
> http://master.debian.org/~ajt/graph.png
Ah, so... sorry, I didn't yet visit the page. I'll have to check it out
now (if it's readable with lynx, the html part).
> It ignores fixed, closed, merged and wishlist bugs.
Do you actually mean ignores all merged? It should count all merged
as one.
> It doesn't ignore forwarded bugs, because they're still bugs, as far as
> I'm concerned.
Agreed, though there are lot of exceptions (but scripts can't know that).
> The last 500 bug reports, including wishlist, fixed, closed, forwarded
> and even the occassional relevant report. 12 were against apt, 11 against
> libc5, 10 against ftp.debian.org, 9 against netbase (eeek!), 9 unfiled,
> 8 against ppp, 7 against dpkg, 6 against man-db, 5 against bot-floppies
> and 5 against bash. Then a handful of 4's, a number of 3's lots of 2's and
> heaps of 1's.
>
> Well. What a pointless set of statistics *that* was.
We can draw some interesting conclusions from that, but I'm too
scared to comment ;)
Which reminds me, is there somewhere a list of BTS mailing lists?
And are they served at lists.debian.org or at bugs.debian.org?
--
enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/
Reply to: