On Thu, Apr 01, 1999 at 01:41:40PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: [I think I agree with essentially everything I snipped. At any rate, I don't have anything to add to it] > > [0] 5800 and *still* skyrocketting. wtf? Where are all these bugs > > *going*?? > ITYM 35800. But it is not that bad, huge number of those are closed, > fixed, forwarded, merged, not really reproducible... Nope, 5800. 5812 to be exact. Check http://master.debian.org/~ajt/graph.png It ignores fixed, closed, merged and wishlist bugs. It doesn't ignore forwarded bugs, because they're still bugs, as far as I'm concerned. And unreproducible bugs are beyond the scope of a script to check. :) > >Anyone want to post a `top 10' list of packages with > > the most new bugs filed in the last week or so? > You're calling for trouble now :) Yeah, well... The last 500 bug reports, including wishlist, fixed, closed, forwarded and even the occassional relevant report. 12 were against apt, 11 against libc5, 10 against ftp.debian.org, 9 against netbase (eeek!), 9 unfiled, 8 against ppp, 7 against dpkg, 6 against man-db, 5 against bot-floppies and 5 against bash. Then a handful of 4's, a number of 3's lots of 2's and heaps of 1's. Well. What a pointless set of statistics *that* was. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred. ``Like the ski resort of girls looking for husbands and husbands looking for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it might seem.''
Attachment:
pgpePGMhvtkeR.pgp
Description: PGP signature