[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#12973: marked as done (new upstream version of 'nn')



Your message dated Mon, 2 Nov 1998 09:49:20 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <m0zaFfs-000anHC@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE>
and subject line This bug has been fixed
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 1997 15:30:55 +0000
Received: (qmail 14010 invoked from network); 14 Sep 1997 14:59:13 -0000
Received: from net-0.adj.com (root@net-0.adj.com@38.212.134.2)
  by 205.229.104.5 with SMTP; 14 Sep 1997 14:59:12 -0000
Received: from gst0hb.hb.provi.de (gst0hb.hb.provi.de [193.101.2.25]) by net-0.adj.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA23238; Sun, 14 Sep 1997 03:02:19 -0700
Received: by gst0hb.hb.provi.de (Smail3.1.29.1 #8)
	id m0xAB6D-000MpcC; Sun, 14 Sep 97 11:36 MET DST
Message-Id: <m0xAB6D-000MpcC@gst0hb.hb.provi.de>
From: guenter@gst0hb.hb.provi.de (Guenter Stueck)
Subject: new upstream version of 'nn'
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 11:36:13 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: nn
Version: 6.5.0.b3.linux.1.1-01

The current upstream Version is 6.5.1; but perhaps it's better to switch
to nn-tk 16.2.

For your reference:

nn 6.5.1: ftp://ftp.isca.uiowa.edu/unix/nn/nn-6.5

nn-tk 16.2: ftp://ftp.uwa.edu.au/pub/nn/nn-tk
            http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/toivo/nn-tk

Greetings, Guenter
-- 
| Guenter Stueck | E-Mail: guenter @ gst0hb.hb.provi.de
| Bremen, Germany 


Reply to: