[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1108777: marked as done (rpmlint: autopkgtest depends on removed package python3-pytest-flake8)

Your message dated Sun, 6 Jul 2025 23:24:09 +0200
with message-id <fc86894a-4c09-4d98-a30b-11453b98e7d6@debian.org>
and subject line Re: rpmlint: autopkgtest depends on removed package python3-pytest-flake8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1108777,
regarding rpmlint: autopkgtest depends on removed package python3-pytest-flake8
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1108777: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1108777
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: rpmlint
Version: 2.7.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: trixie-ignore
X-Debbugs-CC: bage@debian.org

Hi,
I happened to run into the fact that the autopkgtest of src:rpmlint fails in unstable and testing. It fails because one of the test dependencies has been removed in May 2025. Failing tests on amd64 and arm64 are considered RC [1].
With my Release Team member hat on I have tagged this as trixie-ignore as it's so late in the freeze and it's not worth removing the package from trixie because of this at this moment. Having said that, if a fix is possible without fully removing the autopkgtest and without making the test superficial, it's still welcome, but it would need to happen soon. 

Paul

[1] https://release.debian.org/testing/rc_policy.txt

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2.7.0-3

The dependency was unnecessary.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: