[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1018061: pads: segfault at 3a ip



Am 23.03.23 um 17:38 schrieb Tim McConnell:
Bernhard,
Just cause I said it was fixed this happens to show up in journalctl:
systemd-coredump[3614]: Process 1704 (pads) of user 0 dumped core.
Module
libsystemd.so.0 from deb systemd-252.5-2.amd64
                                                   Stack trace of thread 1704:
                                                   #0 0x00005600f24f6954 print_arp_asset_screen (pads + 0x9954)
                                                   #1 0x00005600f24f66f0 print_arp_asset (pads + 0x96f0)
                                                   #2 0x00007fdc7fdb54f6 n/a (libpcap.so.0.8 + 0x84f6)
                                                   #3 0x00007fdc7fdb58ec n/a (libpcap.so.0.8 + 0x88ec)
                                                   #4 0x00007fdc7fdbcd1d pcap_loop (libpcap.so.0.8 + 0xfd1d)
                                                   #5 0x00005600f24efe5b main_pads (pads + 0x2e5b)
                                                   #6 0x00005600f24ef47b main (pads + 0x247b)
                                                   #7 0x00007fdc7fbec18a __libc_start_call_main (libc.so.6 + 0x2718a)
                                                   #8 0x00007fdc7fbec245 __libc_start_main_impl (libc.so.6 + 0x27245)
                                                   #9 0x00005600f24ef4b1 _start (pads + 0x24b1)
                                                   ELF object binary
architecture: AMD x86-64
Mar 04 14:31:02 DebianTim systemd[1]:
systemd-coredump@0-3613-0.service: Deactivated successfully.

Well I thought it was fixed :-(


Hello Time,
are you sure that your rebuilt package is still in place?
The offsets in your new backtrace are exactly the same as
in the email from 8 Feb 2023.

We have not changed the version of the rebuilt package.
Additionally built with "-b".
Then with a "apt dist-upgrade" always
the Debian version gets reinstalled.

Sorry for not mentioning that extra care has to be taken
to hold the rebuilt package version in place.

Kind regards,
Bernhard


Reply to: