On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 02:16:14PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Why would the timidity package remove a conffile that belongs to another > package? That doesn't make sense to me. Because the conffile removed from package A could be installed / taken over by package B. As far as I understood it, it can be marked in this way to belong to package B. If it would just remove the file from A, the user's modifications would be lost. And testing upgrades with (un)modified files suggests that it works like this. Regards, Reiner
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature