[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#564576: marked as done (libspf0: fails with IPv6)

Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:37:27 +0000
with message-id <E1RPig3-0003al-8N@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#648510: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #564576,
regarding libspf0: fails with IPv6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

564576: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=564576
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libspf0
Version: 0.999-1.0.0-p3.dfsg-2
Severity: important


It seems that libspf0 has a problem with validation of IPv6 addresses. I
discovered this problem with spfmilter, and I could reproduce it with
spfqtool. Here is the transcript of a test, with spfquery (libspf2) and
spfqtool (libspf0):
    % spfquery -i 2a01:e34:ee8f:150:201:c0ff:fe04:d58b -s foobar@listes.ortolo.eu
    spfquery: domain of listes.ortolo.eu designates 2a01:e34:ee8f:150:201:c0ff:fe04:d58b as permitted sender
    Received-SPF: pass (spfquery: domain of listes.ortolo.eu designates 2a01:e34:ee8f:150:201:c0ff:fe04:d58b as permitted sender) client-ip=2a01:e34:ee8f:150:201:c0ff:fe04:d58b; envelope-from=foobar@listes.ortolo.eu;

    % spfqtool -h vanvogt.ortolo.eu -i 2a01:e34:ee8f:150:201:c0ff:fe04:d58b -s foobar@listes.ortolo.eu
    SPF short result:   fail                                                                             
    SPF verbose result: policy result: [fail] from rule [-all]
    RFC2822 header:     Received-SPF: fail (vanvogt.ortolo.eu: domain of foobar@listes.ortolo.eu does not designate 2a01:e34:ee8f:15 as permitted sender) receiver=vanvogt.ortolo.eu; client_ip=2a01:e34:ee8f:15; envelope-from=foobar@listes.ortolo.eu;

Here, spfquery is right and spfqtool is wrong, because:
    listes.ortolo.eu.   86400   IN  SPF     "v=spf1 +a:mx1.ortolo.eu +a:mx2.ortolo.eu -all"
    mx2.ortolo.eu.      86400   IN  AAAA    2a01:e34:ee8f:150:201:c0ff:fe04:d58b
(yes, the RFC for SPF defines the “a:” mechanism with A or AAAA lookups,
depending on the IP address family).


Tanguy Ortolo

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libspf0 depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.7-18     GNU C Library: Shared libraries

libspf0 recommends no packages.

libspf0 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.999-1.0.0-p3.dfsg-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package libspf has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/648510

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing

Debian distribution maintenance software
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply to: