[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#437650: marked as done (libdb4.6: FTBFS on s390: in testsuite, run_subsystem: env env007: env66: mmap: Cannot allocate memory)



Your message dated Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:02:21 +0200
with message-id <BANLkTinTaoO2YsZ8YV3U6A3KKWqTNrq5gg@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Old bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #437650,
regarding libdb4.6: FTBFS on s390: in testsuite, run_subsystem: env env007: env66: mmap: Cannot allocate memory
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
437650: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=437650
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libdb4.6
Version: 4.6.18-1
Severity: serious

http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=db;ver=4.6.18-4;arch=s390;stamp=1186982524

Modified test suite run started at: 04:17 08/13/07
Berkeley DB 4.6.18: (July 17, 2007)
Running environment tests (04:17:45)
Running archive tests (04:19:15)
Running backup tests (04:19:30)
Running locking tests (04:19:34)
Running logging tests (04:22:28)
Running memory pool tests (04:27:08)
Running transaction tests (04:31:35)
Running byte-order tests (04:36:41)
Running recno backing file tests (05:21:41)
Running DBM interface tests (05:21:42)
Running NDBM interface tests (05:21:43)
Running Hsearch interface tests (05:21:43)
! grep ^FAIL obj/ALL.OUT
FAIL: run_subsystem: env env007:  env66: mmap: Cannot allocate memory
make: *** [build] Error 1


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Old bug, new versions of db4.6 are compiled just fine.

O.
-- 
Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>


--- End Message ---

Reply to: