Bug#553769: marked as done (replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev)
Your message dated Sun, 08 Aug 2010 12:36:00 +0200
with message-id <E1Oi3EW-0000ao-GH@utumno>
and subject line Package gdb-m68hc1x has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #553769,
regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
553769: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=553769
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
- From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 02:09:24 +0100 (MET)
- Message-id: <200911020109.nA219OJn010897@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Package: gdb-m68hc1x
Version: 1:6.4+3.1+dfsg-5
Severity: important
User: doko@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in unstable and testing. If possible, please replace the libreadline5-dev
build dependency with libreadline-dev, so that in future changes of the
libreadline soname binNMU's can be used for this kind of update.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:6.4+3.1+dfsg-5+rm
You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/553769 in Debian BTS
against the package gdb-m68hc1x. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/592101. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
--- End Message ---
Reply to: