[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#560581: marked as done (gdb-m68hc1x: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `m68hc11-rom.o', needed by `libgdb.a'. Stop.)

Your message dated Sun, 08 Aug 2010 12:36:00 +0200
with message-id <E1Oi3EW-0000ar-OU@utumno>
and subject line Package gdb-m68hc1x has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #560581,
regarding gdb-m68hc1x: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `m68hc11-rom.o', needed by `libgdb.a'.  Stop.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
560581: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560581
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: gdb-m68hc1x
Version: 1:6.4+3.1+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091210 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user-gdb-m68hc1x_6.4+3.1+dfsg-5-amd64-Os89W4/gdb-m68hc1x-6.4+3.1+dfsg/build/gdb'
> CONFIG_HEADERS=config.h:config.in /bin/sh config.status
> config.status: creating Makefile
> config.status: creating .gdbinit
> config.status: creating config.h
> config.status: config.h is unchanged
> config.status: executing default commands
> gcc -c -g -O2     -I. -I../../src/gdb -I../../src/gdb/config -DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/share/locale\"" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../../src/gdb/../include/opcode -I../../src/gdb/../readline/.. -I../bfd -I../../src/gdb/../bfd -I../../src/gdb/../include -I../intl -I../../src/gdb/../intl  -DMI_OUT=1 -DTUI=1 -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wtrigraphs -Wformat -Wparentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wformat-nonliteral -Wunused-label -Wunused-function -Wuninitialized  ../../src/gdb/gdb.c
> gcc -c -g -O2     -I. -I../../src/gdb -I../../src/gdb/config -DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/share/locale\"" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../../src/gdb/../include/opcode -I../../src/gdb/../readline/.. -I../bfd -I../../src/gdb/../bfd -I../../src/gdb/../include -I../intl -I../../src/gdb/../intl  -DMI_OUT=1 -DTUI=1 -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wtrigraphs -Wformat -Wparentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wformat-nonliteral -Wunused-label -Wunused-function -Wuninitialized  ../../src/gdb/m68hc11-tdep.c
> make[3]: *** No rule to make target `m68hc11-rom.o', needed by `libgdb.a'.  Stop.
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/user-gdb-m68hc1x_6.4+3.1+dfsg-5-amd64-Os89W4/gdb-m68hc1x-6.4+3.1+dfsg/build/gdb'
> make[2]: *** [all-gdb] Error 2

The full build log is available from:
   http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2009/12/10/gdb-m68hc1x_1:6.4+3.1+dfsg-5_lsid64.buildlog

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot.  Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.

-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1:6.4+3.1+dfsg-5+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/560581 in Debian BTS
against the package gdb-m68hc1x. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/592101. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--

--- End Message ---
Reply to: