On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 04:59:55PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > It seems to me that we need a shlibs bump as there are two new > functions, is_pad() and is_subwin(), see the 20090906 NEWS entry. > Which means that we could disrupt whatever transition is going on right > now. Sorry for not noticing this earlier. > > Reading the 20100123 NEWS entry I'm also not sure if #542031 is really > fixed in master yet. It might/might not be (seems to work _here_, but gcc's compiler warnings haven't been that consistent across releases). -- Thomas E. Dickey <dickey@invisible-island.net> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature