[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#150322: marked as done (falconseye always uses all available CPU)

Your message dated Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:06:11 +0100
with message-id <200808040806.m7486Bdh007287@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line falconseye has been removed from Debian, closing #150322
has caused the Debian Bug report #150322,
regarding falconseye always uses all available CPU
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

150322: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=150322
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: falconseye
Version: 1.9.3-7
Severity: minor

18802 TomG     tty41     14   0  12M -         R    90.6  4.7   5:21 falconseye

Falcon's Eye maxes the CPU constantly, even though the game plays fine (but a
little slow).

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux nova 2.2.20 #3 Tue Jan 1 18:15:11 UTC 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB

Versions of packages falconseye depends on:
ii  debconf                  999             Fake Debconf package
ii  falconseye-data          1.9.3-7         Data files for Falcon's Eye
ii  libc6                    2.2.5-6         GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libncurses5              5.2.20020112a-7 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libsdl1.2debian          1.2.4-1         Simple DirectMedia Layer

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.9.3-16+rm

The falconseye package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/320075 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Reply to: